Cocks v state of queensland
WebKevin Cocks v State of Queensland. In 1994, the Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre was constructed with a 27 step staircase at the front entrance. However, the … WebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADR 42 JM v QFG (1998) 1 Qd R 373 APPEARANCES & REPRESENTATION: Applicant: D. O Gorman SC instructed by Robert Bax and Associates Respondent: C. Murdoch QC instructed by the Brisbane City Council REASONS FOR DECISION [1]Mr Yeo is a C4/C5 high level complete quadriplegic, and …
Cocks v state of queensland
Did you know?
WebExample: Kevin Cocks v State of Queensland is a real example. Kevin said he was indirectly discriminated against because the front entrance to the Brisbane Convention … WebDick v University of Queensland [2000] 2 Qd R 476; Do Carmo v Ford Excavations Pty Ltd (1983) 154 CLR 234; G D Searle v. Gunn ... Elliott [1987] 2 QdR 509; Hancock v State of Queensland [2002] QSC 27; Hawkins v.Clayton (1988) 164 CLR 539; International General Electric Co of New York Limited v. Customs and Excise Commissioners [1962] Ch 784 ...
WebCocks v State of Queensland [1994] QADT 3 (Member Atkinson) access to premises (Brisbane Convention & Exhibition Centre) special services or facilities exemption; … WebIn the case of Cocks v State of Queensland (1994), Kevin Cocks, a quadriplegia man in a wheel chair filed a case against the Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre for not …
WebWik Peoples v The State of Queensland (commonly known as the Wik decision) is a decision of the High Court of Australia delivered on 23 December 1996 on whether … WebHaving performed poorly in his 2010 clinical exams also indicated the probability of limited success if an alternative assessment was provided to Sklavos Cocks v State of Queensland (1994) In the case of Cocks, the requirement that patrons with mobility impairments enter the newly constructed Brisbane Convention and Exhibition Centre …
Web304 views, 11 likes, 0 loves, 1 comments, 3 shares, Facebook Watch Videos from The Picture Club: The grand staircase at the main entrance of the Brisbane... nissan altima timing belt costWebCocks v State of Queensland. Australian & New Zealand Equal Opportunity Law & Practice, 77281–77285. CCH Australia Limited. (1984e). Dr Siddiqui v Australian Medical Council. Australian & New Zealand Equal Opportunity Law & Practice, 74182–74185. CCH Australia Limited. (1984f). Flannery v O’Sullivan (No. 1). numpy check if infWebCase: Indirect Discrimination - Attribute – Impairment - Type – Indirect –– Area - Services – Exemption – No – Liability - Government Liable Cocks v State of Queensland (1994) … nissan altima top speed mphWebMagistrates Court of Queensland (QMC) 2006- (AustLII) Queensland Mental Health Court (QMHC) 2002- (AustLII) Queensland Planning and Environment Court (QPEC) 1999- … nissan altima through the yearsWebDec 21, 2024 · In Hair v State of Queensland (Queensland Health), the Queensland Industrial Relations Commission ( QIRC) found that Ms Hair, a Human Resources Advisor, was not allowed to work from home... numpy cholesky implementationWebMay 7, 2024 · Robertson v State of Queensland [2024] QCA 92 Fraser JA, McMurdo JA and Henry J 7 May 2024. Background. In the September 2024 edition of WorkCover Update, we shared a case study regarding the District Court of Queensland judgement of Robertson v State of Queensland [2024] QDC 185. Ms Robertson, made a claim for damages … numpy check if value is nanWebIn a complementary program, Queensland Ministers will act as individual champions for discrete Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander communities. Under the Ministerial … nissan altima touch screen radio